Along Came a Spider

How to Spot a Mental Patient

Psycho tropic ads

Fast for Freedom in Mental Health

September 11th, 2001

CineMania supports the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health

 

The Support Coalition International Board of Directors recently voted to support a "self-governing project" to publicly challenge the scientific claims of biopsychiatry by means of a hunger strike in Pasadena,

IT WAS A BRILLIANT CURE... BUT

California. CineMania believes that it is these scientific sounding claims that lend credence to the media stereotypes of the violent and deranged "mental patient" and that justify the use of forced treatment and psychiatric oppression, and, as such, encourages support of this Fast for Freedom in Mental Health. In spite of all the obstacles faced by the hunger strikers, including the August 14th blackout, the Hunger Strike started on time on Saturday, August 16th, 2003.

*****************************************************

Freedom in Mental Health Online Petition

*****************************************************

Thumbnail Photos: Click-on to Enlarge

radio talk show
Michael Benner
the Washington Post
Solidarity Striker?
President of the APA
Hunger Strike Letter
Shaking Hands
Dr. Goin/Dr. Spring
Day 10: Wacko Juice
Dr. Fred Baughman
David Oaks
Dr. Loren Mosher
Lecture Series
Day 9: the bull run
Exposed!
Lecture Series
Day 4: Nerve Center
Day 5: Exhausted
Day 6: David Oaks
Day 7: Hard at Work
Krista is interviewed
Day 3: the Panelists
the Hunger Strikers
Meeting the Press
Day 2: Dr. Shipko
Dawn is interviewed
Dawn and Timothy
the Hunger Strikers

Thumbnail photos: click-on photo to read details

Scientific Panel Clashes with American Psychiatric Association

Other Doctors & Scientists add their names to panel's conclusions

Fast for Freedom Hunger Strikers meet the President of the APA

Fast for Freedom 3rd Lectures Series Presents Dr. Loren Mosher

*****************************************************

Day 15: the Washington Post Reports

*****************************************************

The Debate:
FAST FOR FREEDOM IN MENTAL HEALTH
Provided by the Law Project for Psychiatric Rights in support of the Freedom Fast

Text of cover letter sent from hunger strikers to the American Psychiatric Association (APA), National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI) & Office of Surgeon General. This letter challenges the organizations that assert there is a scientific basis behind the treatments they advocate forcing on people to produce any evidence for their assertions.

 The official request for evidence of biopsychiatry by hunger strikers.

Correspondence with Rick Birkel, Director of NAMI. Dr. Birkel refers to our fast as ideological, totally ignoring the scientific literature supporting our challenge.  He invites us to join him in seeking better access to treatment for "people with mental illness" (i.e. forced treatment), but does not seem at all concerned about better treatment for "people with mental illness." Doesn't Dr. Birkel realize that forced treatment is what created these deplorable conditions in the first place? Would Dr. Birkel join us in seeking better treatment for "people with mental illness"?

The APA's response by Dr. James Scully. This response alleges that the evidence we're requesting is "widely available in the scientific literature," but refuses to provide us with that evidence and suggests that we look for it ourselves.

The 14-member Fast for Freedom panel reponds to Dr, Scully's letter (see below).

Richard Shulman, Ph.D., Licensed Psychologist response to James Scully.  This is a detailed refutation of Scully's assertion that the Surgeon General's Report (cited by Scully) supports the APA's position.

Ruth Ehrenberg's e-mail correspondence with Tom Lane, Director, Office of Consumer Affairs, NAMI. Mr. Lane lashes out at the Fast for Freedom hunger strikers as "those who have no record of constructive activities, services or advocacy." Ehrenberg, a psychiatric victim's grandmother, responds with scientific evidence provided with the help of Jim Gottstein of the Law Project for Psychiatric Rights.

Fred Baughman, M.D., June 5, 2003, letter to Sandra F. Olson, MD, President J American Academy of Neurology. Dr. Baughman is board certified in neurology and child neurology. This letter has a lot of citations debunking the biological basis of psychiatric symptoms, with a focus on ADHD.

Fred Baughman, M.D., May 22, 2003 letter to Daniel R Weinberger, MD, Chief of the Clinical Brain Disorders Branch, challenging him to provide evidence for the unsupported claims made in Neurology Today about the biologic basis of mental illness.

Fred Baughman, M.D., June 24, 2003 letter to to Daniel R Weinberger, MD explaining that saying mental illness is a brain disease does not make it so.

The Law Project for Psychiatric Rights has a series of web pages presenting actual papers involved at Scientific Research by Topic.

*****************************************************

Internal Warning-System or Biologically-Flawed Brain 

"Denying that so-called mental illnesses are diseases, and denying the legitimacy of psychiatry as a branch of medicine, is not to deny the usefulness of psychotropic drugs to certain people, or the value of experts on those drugs to those who might want to take them. This is an extremely important point. A common response to one's rejection of biopsychiatry is to accuse one of being cruel and wanting people to suffer, of wanting to deny helpful drugs to people who wish to take them, of believing that extreme psychic distress does not exist, and so on. This is an awful misinterpretation of what is being said.  Nothing of the kind has been said or implied in this essay. The principal reason for rejecting biopsychiatry (aside from the fact that intellectual honesty demands its rejection) is that it locates the cause of psychic suffering in people's "bad brains," and excludes the conditions of modern life, or anything else, from consideration as the cause of such pain. That is, it acts to deflect attention from the fact that modern life has seen the number of people suffering extreme psychic distress skyrocket we have "epidemics" of "ADHD," and "depression," and "generalized anxiety," as though those things were communicable diseases – and forecloses any discussion of the inhuman conditions under which people live today. If someone finds taking Prozac® helpful, nothing in this essay implies that he or she should not be allowed to take Prozac®. If someone sees such an implication, it is because the division of drugs into "medicines" and "drugs of abuse" leaves no room for any other uses for drugs – if one wishes to procure and consume a psychotropic drug, one must have a disease, have the disease certified by a state-licensed physician, and obtain a permission slip, called a "prescription," before one can legally purchase that drug." (Eaton T. Fores Research Center)

*****************************************************

It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong... Voltaire

*****************************************************

Solidarity Hunger Strikers across the nation and around the globe. Here is a list of supporters who have publicly affirmed their participation in the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health Hunger Strike:

Cara: solidarity hunger striker from the Philippines

Oryx Cohen, co-founder of the Freedom Center, Northampton, MA.

Marc Cowhill, PhD of Blacksburg, Virginia - Empowerment For Healthy Minds, peer-directed advocacy website.

Marcia Donovan, solidarity hunger striker from Santa Clara, California.

Ricky Jaffe Fowler, solidarity hunger striker from Orange County, N.Y.

Will Hall, one of the founders of the Freedom Center, Northhampton, Massachusetts.

Jonathan Harte, solidarity hunger striker from Brockville, Canada.

David Hilton, solidarity hunger striker from Concord, New Hampshire 

Jerri Lynn, Roseville, Minnesota - MN Independent Psychiatric Abuse Watchdog/Whistleblower.

Cathy Marston, PhD, solidarity hunger striker from Iowa City, Iowa.

Debra Nunez, solidarity hunger striker from Eugene, Oregon.

Ria Fey, solidarity hunger striker from Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Shantel Rodriguez, solidarity hunger striker from Brooklyn, New York.

Rev. B. Simpson, solidarity hunger striker from New York, N.Y.

Clover Smith from Ignacio, Colorado - Director/Welcome World, Inc., and author of Escape From Psychiatry.

Ann Blake Tracy, PhD of West Jordan, Utah - International Coalition for Drug Awareness - author of Prozac: Panacea or Pandora?

Greg White, solidarity hunger striker from Cork, Ireland.

David Zupan from the Northwest Media Project, Eugene, Oregon.

*****************************************************

Worldwide support of Fast for Freedom in Mental Health

     Ontario, Canada            American Iatrogenics Association 

     Houston, IndyMedia         Wire from the United Kingdom

     Fitchburg, Wisconsin                     MindFreedom Fast Blog

     Auckland, New Zealand                   Milwaukee, Wisconsin

     IndyMedia from Calfornia                Memphis, Tennessee

     Health Freedom, World Wide            Oikos.org from Italy

     Santa Cruz County, California              Welcome to ASPIRE

     North Hampton, Massachusetts            Sydney, Australia

    IndyMedia from Sydney, Australia          Eugene, Oregon

     Wonderland/SAFE, Springfield, Oregon - Alaska, MHCW

The SAFE, Inc., Board drafted a letter agreeing to black out everything on their website except the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health as a sign of solidarity and support.

*****************************************************

Alliance for Human Research Protection

*****************************************************

Day 18: Solidarity hunger striker Ria Fey, from Massachusetts, is interviewed by the Boston, Phoenix news: "I believe the psychiatric system dehumanizes people," Fey explains. The psychiatric-drug industry, she says, reduces those who suffer from mental illnesses to labels while mystifying everyday emotions like sadness, fear, and anger. As she puts it, "Psychiatry represents to me hierarchy in its purest form, control of actions, attempted regulation of thought and feeling."

*****************************************************

Day 17: The Eugene Weekly prints a report on day 17 of the hunger strike: "Oaks says he's gotten good news from home while he's been on the road. "After more than a decade of complaining," he says, "Sacred Heart has quietly changed their informed consent sheet for electroshock in a way we requested. Meanwhile, the state of Oregon's new director has made it a point to gather statistics on Oregon State Hospital's use of electroshock — also a breakthrough. Given that the Eugene and state breakthrough happened within a week of each other, maybe 'something's happening here.'"

*****************************************************

Day 15: the Washington Post reports on the hunger strike: "When someone has cancer, they don't lock the door behind them, and they show them the tests," Gonzalez said. "But when someone has a mental illness, they lock the door behind them and show them no tests. When they lock that door behind me, I want to know why."

*****************************************************

Day 14: the Seattle Post-Intelligencer posts an article about the Fast for Freedom: "The media routinely refer to NAMI as advocates for the mentally ill, although its membership consists almost entirely of family members and not the mentally ill themselves. NAMI ascribes to the "biological basis of mental illness," and endorses forced treatment of the mentally ill. The movement's major source of funding is the highly profitable pharmaceutical industry, which funds the drug research..."

*****************************************************

Day 12: the hunger strike coverage continues: "The issue, as I have explored in previous columns in this series, is mainly about the dominant psychiatric agenda in play these days: biopsychiatry. The MindFreedom hunger strikers are asking the APA and the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill and the U.S. Surgeon General to provide solid scientific evidence for the "biological basis of mental illness." One reason, aside from the obvious, for their demand is that there is an increasing pattern of forced drugging across the U.S." (7th in a series)

*****************************************************

Day 12: Solidarity hunger strikers Oryx Cohen and Will hall organize a candlelight vigil in support of the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health at the steps of City Hall in downtown Northampton, Massachusetts.

*****************************************************

Day 11: the Register-Guard prints article about Executive Director of MindFreedom.org David Oaks and the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health: "Oaks became an activist after his own experiences with the mental health system. When he was a student at Harvard, he became depressed and overwhelmed. He said he was locked into a cell in a psychiatric unit and forcibly injected with psychiatric drugs."

*****************************************************

Day 10: the hunger strike coverage continues: "The Mind Freedom hunger strikers are greatly concerned that the highly questionable and dominant biopsychiatric agenda, which includes forced drugging of patients, strongly deprives huge numbers of people of community-based treatments that are not drug oriented." (6th in a series

*****************************************************

Day 9: Editor Nicholas Regush continues his on-going coverage: "Thus far, I’ve tried to chronicle the day-in, day-out major highlights of the hunger strike. From the standpoint of a journalist who has covered health for more than 25 years, it doesn’t surprise me in the least that the three groups cited by MindFreedom have turned a deaf ear. And it doesn’t surprise me that the mass media have not indicated much interest — thus far, in covering the hunger strike." (5th in a series)

*****************************************************

Day 8: Latest installment of the Nicholas Regush coverage of the Hunger Strike. "If anyone seriously launched an investigation in Congress to determine how much money flows down the drain each year in mental health because of bad science and how much conflict of interest is at play, I’m betting that the results would reveal one of the biggest rip-offs ever in American medicine." (4th in a series)

*****************************************************

Day 7: the Law Project for Psychiatric Rights, Inc., sends out the following Press Release: "On August 20th, 2003, the Law Project for Psychiatric Rights (PsychRights.org), formally announced it had joined the growing list of supporters in solidarity with the hunger strikers in their Fast for Freedom in Mental Health."

*****************************************************

IMPORTANT: the Fast for Freedom hunger strikers are all asking the supporters of the Hunger Strike to please forward the following press release to their local media stations. (Download Press Release here)

*****************************************************

Day 7: editor Nicholas Regush of Redflagsdaily.com continues his on-going coverage of the hunger strike: "MindFreedom wants the APA, the National Alliance For the Mentally Ill (NAMI) and the Office of the Surgeon General of the United States to defend their biopsychiatric approach to mental illness by pointing to clear-cut evidence - and not speculation... this is not a lot to ask, considering that today’s dominant psychiatric agenda is to put people it designates as "mentally ill" on powerful drugs — and by force if necessary." (3rd in a series)

*****************************************************

Marcus Cowgill

Day 6: Marcus Cowgill, solidarity hunger striker from Blacksburg, Virginia, is interviewed by the Roanoke Times. This Virginian "holds a doctorate in industrial and organizational psychology from Virginia Tech and co-founded a local mental health advocacy group called Empowerment for Healthy Minds, the answer to what he wants is simple. 'We just want alternatives,' he said. We want to stop what we consider to be forced drugging."

*****************************************************

Day 6: editor Nicholas Regush of Redflagsdaily.com continues his on-going report on the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health (2nd in a series): "...the APA is so out of touch with the science that there should be a Congressional investigation to determine the role the drug industry has had in shaping uneducated viewpoints and policies at APA central... the APA, has more to do with profit and career enhancement than it has to do with patient care. And I’m being very nice."

*****************************************************

Day 6: Deprived of food for six days, the hunger strikers fell into a state of deep depression... when lo and behold a new anti-depressant was created. Feeling depressed? Try the new psyber-tropic fast-acting anti-depressant! Logon, Smile, and Be Happy! Be sure to turn up your speakers to obtain the maximum therapeutic dose. 

*****************************************************

Day 6: the Pasadena Weekly reports on the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health: "Weinberg, a retired social worker who has no history of mental illness, pioneered the use of grassroots organizing strategies within the psychiatry survivors movement after witnessing numerous human rights abuses under the auspices of mental health care..." (Mad as Hell)

*****************************************************

August 21st, 2003, Day 6: the 14 member scientific panel and the six Fast for Freedom hunger strikers reply to Dr. Scully's letter:

James H. Scully, Jr., M.D., Medical Director
American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825
Arlington, VA 22209-3901

Dear Dr. Scully:

David Oaks, Executive Director of MindFreedom,
has forwarded to us your reply dated 12 August
2003 to the hunger strikers involved in a "Fast
for Freedom in Mental Health." We are a panel of
14 academics and clinicians who have agreed to
review any such reply for scientific validity.

The hunger strikers asked your organization, as
well as the Surgeon General of the United States,
and the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill, to
provide:

1. evidence that establishes the validity of
"schizophrenia," "depression" or other "major
mental illnesses" as "biologically-based brain
diseases";

2. evidence for a physical diagnostic exam that
can reliably distinguish individuals with these
diagnoses (prior to treatment with psychiatric
drugs) from individuals without these diagnoses;

3. evidence for a baseline standard of a
neurochemically-balanced "normal" individual,
against which a neurochemical "imbalance" can be
measured;

4. evidence that any psychotropic drug can
correct any "chemical imbalance" attributed to a
psychiatric diagnosis;

5. evidence that any psychotropic drug can
reliably decrease the likelihood of violence or
suicide.

In your reply, no specific studies of any kind
were cited with reference to any of the questions
above. You cited three general sources, including
the recent Surgeon General's report on mental
health and two textbooks of psychiatry.

In examining each of these sources, we found
numerous statements that invalidate suggestions
that behaviors referred to as "mental illnesses"
have specific biological bases:

_Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General_
(1999) is explicit about the absence of any
findings of specific pathophysiology:

p. 44: "The diagnosis of mental disorders is
often believed to be more difficult than
diagnosis of somatic, or general medical,
disorders, since there is no definitive lesion,
laboratory test, or abnormality in brain tissue
that can identify the illness."

p. 48: "It is not always easy to establish a
threshold for a mental disorder, particularly in
light of how common symptoms of mental distress
are and the lack of objective, physical symptoms."

p. 49: "The precise causes (etiology) of mental
disorders are not known."

p. 51: "All too frequently a biological change in
the brain (a lesion) is purported to be the
'cause' of a mental disorder ... [but] The fact
is that any simple association -- or correlation --
cannot and does not, by itself, mean causation."

p. 102: "Few lesions or physiologic abnormalities
define the mental disorders, and for the most part
their causes remain unknown."

In the third edition of _Textbook of Clinical
Psychiatry_ (1999), we find similar statements:

p. 43: "Although reliable criteria have been
constructed for many psychiatric disorders,
validation of the diagnostic categories as
specific entities has not been established."

p. 51: Most of these [genetic studies] examine
candidate genes in the serotonergic pathways, and
have not found convincing evidence of an
association."

In Andreasen and Black's (2001) _Introductory
Textbook of Psychiatry_, we find, in the chapter
on schizophrenia:

p. 23. "In the areas of pathophysiology and
etiology, psychiatry has more uncharted territory
than the rest of medicine...Much of the current
investigative research in psychiatry is directed
toward the goal of identifying the
pathophysiology and etiology of major mental
illnesses, but this goal has been achieved for
only a few disorders (Alzheimer's disease,
multi-infarct dementia, Huntington's disease, and
substance-induced syndromes such as
amphetamine-related psychosis or
Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome)."

p. 231: "In the absence of visible lesions and
known pathogens, investigators have turned to the
exploration of models that could explain the
diversity of symptoms through a single cognitive
mechanism."

p. 450: "Many candidate regions [of the brain]
have been explored [for schizophrenia] but none
have been confirmed."

As you are no doubt familiar with these textbooks
you cited, you will agree that such statements
invalidate claims for specific, reliable
biological causes or signs of "mental illnesses."
In the judgment of the panel members, your reply
fails to produce or cite any specific evidence of
any specific pathophysiology underlying any
"mental disorder."

You have also referred us to 60 volumes of
_Archives of General Psychiatry_ and 160 volumes
of _The American Journal of Psychiatry_. The 28
July 2003 cover letter from the hunger strikers
and panelists that they sent to you by certified
mail stated:

"We are aware that research studies can run to
thousands of pages. Therefore, please respond
only with those studies that you consider the
best available in support of your claims and
theories in a timely way. When responding with
evidence, please send citations for the original
publications or copies of the publications you
are citing."

Like you, we are familiar with the material found
in these journals. It is understandable why you
did not provide any citations. There is not a
single study that provides valid and reliable
evidence for the "biological basis of mental
illness."

The members of the panel wish to make some
further observations which we hope will assist
the American Psychiatric Association to present
an honest scientific stance with respect to the
hunger strikers' questions.

In the panel's view, the questions posed by the
hunger strikers are serious and fair. These
questions are legitimate questions that any
patient or family member or interested person
might ask of any psychiatrist, or a student might
ask of a professor. The panel was therefore quite
dismayed that you, as Medical Director of the
world's largest, wealthiest, and most resourceful
psychiatric association, could not provide a more
specific or substantial response than the
equivalent of, "See our textbook."

If, as you state in your letter, "the answers to
[the above] questions are widely available in the
scientific literature, and have been for years,"
then it behooves your organization to make these
answers and their specific sources -- if they
differ from the quotes we present in this letter
-- available promptly.

The panel members could not help but notice the
contrast between the hunger strikers, who ask
clear questions about the science of psychiatry
and consciously take risks in the name of
protecting the well-being of users of psychiatry,
and the American Psychiatric Association, which
evades revealing what actual scientific evidence
justifies its authority. By not giving specific
answers to the questions posed by the hunger
strikers, you appear to be affirming the very
reason for the hunger strike.

Sincerely,

Fred Baughman, MD
Mary Boyle, PhD
Peter Breggin, MD
David Cohen, PhD
Ty Colbert, PhD
Pat Deegan, PhD
Al Galves, PhD
Thomas Greening, PhD
David Jacobs, PhD
Jay Joseph, PsyD
Jonathan Leo, PhD
Bruce Levine, PhD
Loren Mosher, MD
Stuart Shipko, MD

The hunger strikers endorse the scientific
panel's statement
.

*****************************************************

August 20st, 2003, Day 5: Nicholas Regush, the editor of Red Flags Daily, writes a to-be-continued report: "...psychiatry is tied by an umbilical cord made of greenbacks to the drug industry. Its journals and many of its practitioners have long sold out to fame and fortune promised by the drug merchants. Sure, some people benefit from drug therapy, but in recent years, there has been such an enormous upturn of drugging that this has disqualified psychiatry as a medical endeavor. It’s become, by and large, a mobster on a rampage." 

*****************************************************

August 19th, 2003, Day 4: the Hunger Strikers receive a response from the APA to their Fast for Freedom in Mental Health Statement:

Mr. David Oaks
c/o Stuart Shipko, M.D. 
Pasadena, CA   91105

Dear Mr. Oaks:

I am acceding to your request that I send my response to your letter of July 28, 2003 to Dr. Stuart Shipko.

The mission of the American Psychiatric Association is to promote the highest quality care for individuals with mental illness and substance abuse disorders and their families. In recent years, there has been substantial progress in understanding the neuroscientific basis of many mental illnesses.  Research offers hope and must continue.

The answers to your questions are widely available in the scientific literature, and have been for years.  I suggest you begin your review with Surgeon General David Satcher's report, "Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General." In addition, I recommend the Introductory Textbook of Psychiatry (3rd edition), edited by Andreasen and Black. This is a "user-friendly" textbook for persons just being introduced to the field of psychiatry.

A more substantial and advanced series would include The American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.'s "Textbook of Clinical Psychiatry (4th edition)," edited by Hales and Yodofsky. For the latest science, of course, there are the American Journal of Psychiatry and Archives of General Psychiatry, among many other journals which are available in both printed and on-line versions.

These are but a few of the extensive number of scientific
publications that answer your questions.

I share the concern of Rick Berkel [sic] of NAMI that your proposed activities are ill-considered and invite you to join NAMI to help improve the care of our fellow citizens who suffer from serious mental illnesses.

Sincerely,

James H. Scully, Jr., M.D., Sc.D.
Medical Director

*****************************************************

Day 3: KPCC staff reporter Rachael Myrow covers the start of the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health. RealOne Player required to hear audio.

*****************************************************

Sunday, August 17th, 2003, Day 2: the Pasadena Star News prints an article about the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health: "Dawn Rider, 45, from Utah is there to support the strikers. 'My family was torn asunder by psychiatric drugs,' she said. Her son, 12, was placed on Prozac to fight depression, she said, and committed suicide when he was 14."

*****************************************************

This four-story high ad on a building near the corner of 72nd Street and Amsterdam Avenue in New York City is an example of biopsychiatry's claims. The ad written in big black bold letters matter-of-factly states:

DEPRESSION IS A FLAW IN CHEMISTRY

NOT CHARACTER

FOR FREE INFORMATION CALL:

1-800-829-8289

Many physicians in the United States might remember this widely circulated ad placed in newspapers in 1995 by the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD). Biopsychologist Elliot S. Valenstein, points out how misleading this ad was: "After describing depression as a physical disease requiring medication, just as diabetes requires insulin treatment, the ad makes the claim that research has shown that depression results from an insufficient level of serotonin in the frontal lobes of the brain. A brain scan depicting enlarged ventricles is included in the ad, with the statement that this condition has been found in many severe cases of depression." However "this finding has no logical connection to any biochemical deficiency, let alone to a specific deficiency of serotonin in the frontal lobes... the fact that the information in this ad is completely in error seems not to have troubled anyone." If you would like to comment on this ad or on the Fast for Freedom in Mental Health, you are invited to post your views on the Hunger Strike Message Board.

*****************************************************

Copyright © 2007 MentalHealthStigma.com, All Rights Reserved

Fair Use Notice: Please note that MentalHealthStigma.com contains copyrighted (©) material, the use of which has not necessarily been authorized by the copyright owner. These materials are presented strictly for educational purposes only and therefore constitute a fair use of copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. MentalHealthStigma.com does not sell any products of any kind and does not profit in any way from the use of these copyrighted materials. If you wish to use any copyrighted materials for purposes that exceed the confines of fair use as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law, you must first obtain permission from the copyright owner. MentalHealthStigma.com authorizes the use of any information unique to MentalHealthStigma.com, so long as www.mentalhealthstigma.com is acknowledged as the source of that information.